Research Shows That Growing Up in a Single-parent Family

  • Loading metrics

Growing upwardly with a single mother and life satisfaction in adulthood: A test of mediating and moderating factors

  • Sakari Lemola

Growing upwards with a single mother and life satisfaction in machismo: A examination of mediating and moderating factors

  • David Richter,
  • Sakari Lemola

PLOS

x

  • Published: June 15, 2017
  • https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179639

Abstract

Single parenthood is increasingly mutual in Western societies but only piddling is known well-nigh its long-term effects. Nosotros therefore studied life satisfaction among 641 individuals (ages xviii–66 years) who spent their entire childhood with a unmarried mother, 1539 individuals who spent function of their childhood with both parents just and so experienced parental separation, and 21,943 individuals who grew up with both parents. Individuals who grew upwardly with a single mother for their entire childhood and to a lesser degree too individuals who experienced parental separation showed a small-scale merely persistent decrease in life satisfaction into old age controlling childhood socio-economical status. This decrease was partly mediated past worse machismo living weather related to socio-economic and educational success, physical wellness, social integration, and romantic human relationship outcomes. No moderation past age, gender, and societal organisation where the childhood was spent (i.eastward. western oriented Germany or socialist GDR) was institute.

Introduction

Single parenthood is increasingly common in Western societies, with 27.5% of children in the Usa currently being raised in single-parent households—more lxxx% of them in households headed by unmarried mothers [1]. Although the importance of studying the long-term consequences of single parenthood on children is clear, there is nevertheless a dearth of knowledge on the relative force of long-term furnishings of unmarried parenthood on children's well-being at dissimilar stages of the developed life-bridge besides as on the involved mechanisms. Therefore, we study differences in life-satisfaction across adulthood related to differences in childhood family construction in a large representative German language console report. We focus on life-satisfaction in machismo every bit a highly desirable characteristic which is assumed to play a crucial role for the populations' health, longevity, and citizenship [two, 3].

There are three chief pathways by which being raised by a unmarried mother may produce a long-lasting impact on well-being in adulthood. First, children in single-mother households are more likely to suffer from less effective guardianship and a higher likelihood of family distress and conflicts (due east.yard., [4]). It is well established that two-parent families generally provide more emotional resource to children than single-parent families (east.1000., [5, 6]). In a related vein, children, whose parents divorce, exhibit slightly lower psychological well-existence and social adjustment than children from stable ii-parent families (e.thou., [5, 7, viii–10]). The experience of parental divorce may cause further emotional distress to the child [5, xi] and may eventually lead to an insecure attachment representation [5, 12]. Prolonged family distress and insecure attachment representation may in turn complicate the evolution of social skills and make it more difficult to appoint in satisfying intimate relationships which may eventually also hamper life-satisfaction during adulthood [12].

A 2d pathway of touch on is related to the generally lower socio-economic status and increased risk of economic deprivation among children in unmarried-mother households (e.g., [4]). Economic deprivation affects children's adjustment and well-beingness in multiple ways. Children from poor households are at increased chance to live in a depression quality abode environment and poor neighborhood conditions. They are more often exposed to harsh parental rearing practices and poor parental mental health, and they more than oftentimes receive suboptimal nutrition and endure from poor physical health [13]. Finally, economic deprivation also increases the likelihood of these children to enter careers with poor socio-economic prospects and to testify poor social integration when they reach early adulthood [5].

A tertiary pathway can be summarized as the 'missing-father hypothesis.' In popular science, it has been discussed that children need both a mother and a father, presuming that fathering involves singled-out and necessary qualities which are particularly important for gender identity germination in boys (eastward.1000., [fourteen, 15]). There is also prove that the absence of a father is associated with an increase in antisocial behaviors in boys, including violence, criminality, and substance abuse [16] and a decrease in social adjustment in general [v].

The present study

In the nowadays report, nosotros examine whether general life satisfaction is lower among adults raised by a single mother than for adults raised in 2-parent families. To do so, we compare the full general life satisfaction of adults reared by their single mothers with respondents who grew upward with both parents. As single parenthood and parental divorce are associated with parental socio-economical background and education, we statistically command for parents' teaching and occupational prestige along with the respondents' age and sex.

We expect to find a dose-response relationship, that is, that adults who spent at least function of their babyhood in a two-parent family are affected less—despite the pregnant stresses associated with the experience of parental separation [five]. We look a smaller decrease in general life satisfaction in this grouping, as the parent who left the family unit may withal provide resources to support children when they enter adulthood—which is less probable when the parent has never lived together with the child.

Second, we test arbitration models namely whether the association between childhood family unit structure and general adulthood life satisfaction is mediated by life outcomes that may be summarized as adulthood life success, including educational attainment, employment status, occupational prestige, net income, physical health, integration into social networks, and success in romantic relationships as at that place is evidence that these life-circumstances are affected in a negative way past growing up in a unmarried parent household and/or by having experienced parental divorce [5]. Nosotros hypothesize that differences in these life circumstances during adulthood partly explain the divergence in general adulthood life satisfaction betwixt individuals who have been raised by unmarried mothers and their counterparts who grew upwards with both parents.

3rd, we test moderation of the furnishings by 3 possible moderating variables, historic period, gender, and societal system where the children grew upward. Regarding age differences ane might assume that the effects of single parenthood wane across the developed life-span following the full general psychological principle that the longer ago a negative experience the smaller the imposed impact (due east.g., [17]). Regarding gender differences nosotros test the idea frequently echoed in popular science, namely that men who were raised by unmarried mothers are more disadvantaged in machismo than their female counterparts. Finally, regarding the question if dissimilar societal systems differentially affect the role of childhood family unit settings for adulthood life satisfaction we compare individuals who grew up in the Federal Republic of Frg and in the German Democratic Republic. The western oriented Federal Democracy of Germany (Frg) and the socialist German Democratic Republic (German democratic republic), which existed betwixt 1949 and 1990, differed sharply in terms of several variables that may mayhap be relevant for unmarried parent families namely divorce rate, female participation in the labor market, and kid day-care infrastructure. The divorce rate in the socialist German democratic republic was near twice as high as in the FRG and female participation in the labor market place was at 89% compared to 55% in the FRG in 1990 [18]. Even more drastic deviation existed with regard to the child day-care infrastructure; more than than half of the children who grew up in the socialist German democratic republic were in regular 24-hour interval-intendance, which was free of charge, while less than ii% were in day-care in the Federal republic of germany at the end of the 1980s [19]. Due to these differences we await that children who grew up with single mothers in the socialist GDR were less disadvantaged compared to their counterparts who grew up with both parents than children who grew up with unmarried mothers in the Deutschland; we wait this, as the higher divorce-rate may take reduced the stigma associated with single parenthood in the GDR, moreover, unmarried motherhood was possibly related with relatively less economic burden in the Gdr compared to the Deutschland.

Methods

Sample

The data are from the SOEP (Version xxx), which is an ongoing, nationally representative longitudinal study of individual households in Germany running since 1984. Comprehensive information about the data collection, design, respondents, variables, and assessment procedures is reported in Wagner, Frick, and Schupp [xx].

The sample comprised of 26,936 adults built-in after 1946, of whom 24,123 adults between the ages of 17 and 66 years (Thou = 37.86 years, SD = xiii.50 years; 52.1% female) were analyzed in the present paper. Given the present study's focus on the effect of unmarried parenthood vs. growing up with both parents, we categorized the participants into three subgroups: individuals who lived with both parents upward to the age of fifteen (n = 21,943), those whose parents separated and who lived with their mothers for between one and 14 years (n = 1539), and those who lived with a single mother up to the age of 15 (n = 641). Data from 2813 respondents were excluded who had spent part of their babyhood in different family settings (e.g., raised by the mother and a new partner, by a single begetter with or without a new partner, or by other relatives; among the excluded respondents there were 207 individuals who grew up with a single father for 1–14 years and 21 individuals who grew upwards with a unmarried father for 15 years, respectively).

Regarding the societal system where the children grew upwards, in the FRG, eighteen,186 respondents grew up with both parents up to the historic period of xv, 1234 lived with their mothers for between 1 and 14 years, and 483 lived with a unmarried mother up to the age of xv. In the quondam GDR, 3757 respondents grew up with both parents up to the age of fifteen, 305 lived with their mothers for betwixt 1 and 14 years, and 158 lived with a single mother up to the age of fifteen.

Materials

Although life satisfaction has been measured since the very kickoff of the SOEP study in 1984, the information on where respondents had spent the first fifteen years of their lives was but bachelor for respondents who entered the panel afterward the year 2000. During the xiv years of data drove, respondents reported their general life satisfaction ('All things considered, how satisfied are you lot with your life in general?') at the cease of each yearly interview using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied), a measure with high reported reliability and validity [21]. To minimize error variance and to go a global indicator of adult well-existence, full general life satisfaction was estimated by aggregating all information available to build a mean-score (M = 7.33, SD = 1.49). On boilerplate, respondents provided four.71 (SD = 4.29; range = 1–fourteen) data points of full general life satisfaction.

When entering the panel study, respondents reported where they had grown up in the first fifteen years of their life ("How many years of your babyhood (up until age 15) did you live with the following persons? Please round off to the nearest year"). For our analyses, nosotros used data from the response options "with both your father and mother (biological or adoptive)" and "with your mother without a new husband or partner".

The participants too reported their socio-economical status (SES) in childhood (i.eastward., their parents' pedagogy and occupational prestige), their own SES in adulthood (i.e., employment status, occupational prestige, education, and internet income), their concrete health status during adulthood (the number of visits to the md, reverse-coded), their social integration in machismo (number of friends, number of visits to/from friends, and number of visits to/from family members), and success in romantic relationships (their relationship status and if they were divorced). Descriptive statistics of the report variables for the three subgroups are presented in Table one.

Occupational prestige was scored from xiii to 78 using the Standard International Occupation Prestige Score index (SIOPS; [22]). Occupational prestige was not available for 5377 (22.3%) of the respondents and for 12,331 (51.1%) mothers and 7097 (29.4%) fathers of respondents. In near cases these individuals had no occupational prestige due to being homemakers or existence unemployed. In rare cases, however, participants also did not know their parents' occupation. Missing occupational prestige was scored with the everyman value possible following the rationale that beingness unemployed or homemaker is regarded as lower in prestige than all other paid piece of work. Respondents' full general occupational prestige was estimated by computing the mean of all yearly information bachelor.

Education of parents measured when respondents entered the panel and scored from i to 3 (no teaching [1]: no school omnipresence, no degree obtained, other degree obtained, or respondent did not know; low didactics [ii]: lower-track secondary schoolhouse; and high teaching [3]: intermediate-runway or upper-rails secondary schoolhouse). Education of respondents was scored using the International Standard Nomenclature of Education (ISCED-1997; [23]. Prior to the analyses respondents' ISCED-Scores were complanate into 3 categories (depression education [1]: ISCED-Scores 0, 1, and 2; medium pedagogy [2]: ISCED-Scores three and 4; and high educational activity [3]: ISCED-Scores five and 6). Missing information on education (northward = 138, 0.6%) was scored as the everyman category.

Yearly data on the employment condition of respondents were coded to generate a continuous index (full-time employment was coded 1.0, regular part-time employment or vocational training were coded 0.5, marginal, irregular office-time employment was coded 0.25, and non employed was coded 0.0) and collapsed into a mean score to correspond the general employments status of respondents beyond the years they reported their life satisfaction.

The number of doctor visits likewise as their generalized monthly net income in EUR were estimated past calculating the mean of all yearly data bachelor.

Social network status was measured in the years 2003, 2008, and 2013. Respondents reported how often they "visited or were visited by neighbors, friends, or acquaintances" and how often they "visited or were visited past family members or relatives" on a 1 (daily) to five (never) scale. In the assay, the scales of these variables were reversed. In addition, respondents answered the question "how many close friends would you say that you lot have?". Respondents' full general social network condition was estimated by calculating the mean of all data available.

Respondents' partnership status was coded (with partner was coded 1.0, no partner was coded 0.0) and collapsed into a mean score to represent the respondent'south general relationship condition across the years they reported their life satisfaction. Similarly, we coded whether respondents' marital status was "divorced" (divorced was coded 1.0, all other marital statuses were coded 0.0) for the years they reported their life satisfaction and complanate the data into a mean score.

Intercorrelations of all study variables are depicted in S1 Table.

Analyses

In a kickoff stride, respondents' z-standardized general life satisfaction served as the dependent variable in hierarchical multiple regression analyses. In this analysis, dummy-coded variables were used to represent the childhood family settings of the subgroups. These analyses controlled respondents' age, historic period2, ageiii, and sex as well equally parents' education (dummy coded) and parents' occupational prestige (standardized). Age was centered before agetwo and agethree were calculated.

In a second step, analyses of variance were conducted to test whether indicators of adulthood life outcomes including adulthood SES, physical health, social integration, and success in romantic relationships varied significantly in the three aforementioned subgroups. Again, respondents' age, age2, age3, and sex too as parents' didactics (dummy coded) and occupational prestige (standardized) were entered into the equations to control for these background variables.

In a third step, mediation analyses were conducted to test whether differences in adulthood life satisfaction related to babyhood family unit construction were mediated past indicators of machismo life outcomes including adulthood SES, physical health, social integration, and success in romantic relationships in adulthood. These possible mediators of the consequence of babyhood family settings on general life satisfaction were entered in three blocks. In model ane (baseline model), parents' education (dummy coded) and occupational prestige (standardized) were included into the equation to control for childhood SES. In model two, respondents' own education (dummy coded), occupational prestige (standardized), employment status (centered), and net income (standardized) were entered equally one block representing machismo SES. In model three, respondents' adulthood concrete health (number of doctor visits, contrary coded, and centered) was entered to the equation. Finally, in model 4 respondents' number of friends (centered), visits to/from friends (centered), visits to/from family unit members (centered), partnership condition (centered), and having been divorced (centered) were entered as one block representing adulthood social integration and success in romantic relationships.

First, we compared the variance explained by childhood family settings (only decision-making age, age2, historic periodthree, and sex) with the variance that childhood family settings explained after the control variables of model i (babyhood SES) had been entered to the regression model. 2nd, we compared the variance explained by childhood family unit settings in model i (only controlling childhood SES) with the variance that childhood family settings explained subsequently the mediators of model 2 (adulthood SES) had been entered to the regression model. Third, nosotros compared the variance explained by the babyhood family settings in model 2 with the variance that childhood family settings explained subsequently the mediators of model 3 (model 2 mediators plus concrete wellness) had been entered to the regression model. Finally, we compared the variance explained by the babyhood family unit settings in model three with the variance that childhood family settings explained after the mediators of model 4 (model three mediators plus adulthood social integration and success in romantic relationships) had been entered to the regression model.

Additionally, we besides evaluated indirect paths of childhood family unit settings on adulthood general life satisfaction via these mediators employing the Structural Equation Modeling module of stata 13. Hither, all possible indirect paths were tested in individual models decision-making age, age2, historic periodiii, sex, and childhood SES.

In a fourth pace, we included interaction terms into the regression analyses to clarify if the furnishings of the childhood family unit structure on adulthood life satisfaction varied depending on respondents' sex and age when completing the questionnaire following the process proposed past Aiken and West [24]. In addition, we tested whether associations of the different childhood family settings with general life satisfaction in adulthood differed for individuals who grew up in the FRG or the GDR.

The analyses were conducted with SPSS 20 and stata 13.

Results

Babyhood family settings and machismo life satisfaction

The main analyses showed a meaning association of the unlike childhood family unit settings with general life satisfaction. Compared to people raised by both parents, respondents reared past a unmarried mother for between ane and 14 years or for the entire commencement fifteen years of their lives reported significantly lower general life satisfaction than the group reared past both parents. The consequence sizes for the difference in life satisfaction between the two groups reared by a unmarried mother and the group reared by both parents were in the minor range (1–xiv years: d = 0.10 p < .001, entire outset 15 years: d = 0.19, p < .001). Fig 1A depicts the association between babyhood family unit settings and adulthood life satisfaction beyond the adult life-span controlling for babyhood SES. The values underlying Fig 1A are reported in Table 2, Model 1. The clan between childhood family settings and adulthood life satisfaction was non chastened past respondents' age or respondents' sex activity (for further details encounter below).

thumbnail

Fig 1.

A. Association of general life satisfaction with childhood family settings across the adult life-span controlling for respondents' sex and childhood SES. 1B. Association of adulthood life outcomes (machismo SES, physical health, social integration, and romantic relationship success) with childhood family settings controlling for respondents' sexual activity, age, and childhood SES.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179639.g001

Childhood family settings and adulthood life circumstances

Fig 1B depicts the diverse domains of developed life outcomes including machismo SES, physical health, adulthood social integration, and romantic relationship success separately for individuals who grew up with both parents, who lived with a unmarried mother for between i and xiv years (i.eastward., individuals whose parents separated at some indicate in childhood), or who spent their first 15 years living with a single mother, controlling for childhood SES. Growing upward with a single mother was associated with lower SES in babyhood including lower parental education and occupational prestige (mother'southward instruction p < .01, all other pdue south < .001). Growing up with a unmarried female parent was further related to the participants' own SES in adulthood including employment status, occupational prestige, and cyberspace income. This association exhibited bear witness of a dose-response human relationship: individuals who spent their first 15 years living with a single mother reported lower SES in adulthood than individuals who spent betwixt 1 and xiv years living with a unmarried mother, who again were lower than their counterparts who lived with both parents throughout childhood, controlling for their childhood SES (all linear trends p < 0.05).

Participants who spent their first fifteen years with a unmarried mother further showed a lower degree of social integration during adulthood, including a smaller number of friends and fewer visits to/from family as well equally less success in romantic relationships, including a lower probability of living with a partner and a higher probability of having been divorced, decision-making for childhood SES (linear trends p < 0.05). Again the result was somewhat stronger for participants who lived with a single mother for their offset 15 years compared to their counterparts whose parents separated at some signal during babyhood. By and large, the effect sizes were in the modest range, and no significant association between childhood family settings and concrete health (number of doctor visits, reverse-coded) and number of visits to/from friends was revealed after controlling childhood SES (run across too S2 Tabular array).

Mediation of the effect on life satisfaction by adulthood life circumstances

Mediation analyses revealed that a large part of the variance in life satisfaction between dissimilar childhood family settings was explained past childhood SES, including differences in the didactics and occupational prestige of the respondents' parents (i.eastward., 29% of the variance; meet Tabular array 2, Model 1). Inclusion of respondents' own education, occupational prestige, employment condition, and net income during adulthood into the model attenuated the association of the unlike childhood family settings with general life satisfaction past a further 20% (Model 2). Inclusion of physical health (Model three) adulterate the clan of the different childhood family settings with life satisfaction by a further vi%. Finally, inclusion of respondents' social integration and success in romantic relationships adulterate the association of the different childhood family settings with life satisfaction by a further sixteen% (Model 4). However, the differences in general life satisfaction between respondents who lived with both parents for their starting time xv years of life and either group of respondents reared by a single mother remained pregnant in all models, even when all adulthood life circumstances were controlled for.

Evaluation of the indirect paths between 'growing up with a unmarried female parent for ane–fourteen years vs. with both parents' and general life satisfaction revealed that paths mediated by respondents' education, employment status, physical health, and number of friends were significant (p < 0.05, meet Fig 2). Regarding indirect paths between 'growing up with a single mother for the entire childhood vs. with both parents' and general life satisfaction, paths mediated by respondents' education, employment condition, occupational prestige, net income, number of friends, visits to/from family unit, partnership status, and experience of divorce in machismo were pregnant (p < 0.05, run into Fig 2).

thumbnail

Fig 2. Results of path model estimating indirect effects from childhood family settings to adult life-satisfaction via adulthood life circumstances.

Indirect paths were estimated separately in private models but illustrated here together in ane model for presentational parsimony. All models controlled age, age2, age3, sex, and babyhood SES. Values are unstandardized path coefficients with 95% confidence limits. Life satisfaction, occupational prestige and net income were standardized; employment status, physical health (number of doctor visits, opposite coded), number of friends, visits to/from family unit, partnership status, and having been divorced were centered.

https://doi.org/x.1371/journal.pone.0179639.g002

Moderation of the effect of life circumstances on life satisfaction by sex activity

Testing sexual practice differences regarding the function of these adulthood life circumstances for life satisfaction revealed that physical health (i.e., the contrary-coded number of dr. visits; men: β = .09, t = 2.46, p > .05, women: β = .20, t = 5.eighty, p < .001, sex × concrete wellness interaction: t = 2.66, p < .01) and number of friends (men: β = .05, t = 1.17, p = .241, women: β = .16, t = 4.61, p < .001, sex × number of friends interaction: t = 2.54, p < .01) were more than strongly associated with life satisfaction among women who spent betwixt 1 and 14 years of their childhood living with a unmarried mother when compared to their male counterparts. No corresponding interactions with sex were found for those who spent fifteen years living with a unmarried mother.

Moderation of the effect of childhood family settings on life satisfaction by historic period, sex activity, and societal arrangement (FGR vs. Gdr)

Moderation effects of the association between babyhood family settings and adulthood life satisfaction past respondents' age and respondents' sex activity were non-meaning when decision-making for respondents' childhood SES (age: F(6, 24104) = 0.807, p = .564, all age × years with unmarried mother interactions: t < 0.45, p > .656; sex: F(2, 24108) = 2.554, p = .078, sexual practice × 1–14 years with unmarried mother interaction: t = 1.74, p = .081, sex activity × 15 years with single female parent interaction: t = 1.51, p = .131), indicating that the effect does not change with historic period and does not differ betwixt men and women. In addition, the association between childhood family settings and adulthood life satisfaction did not differ significantly between individuals who grew up in the FGR or the GDR (F(2, 24107) = 0.734, p = .480, Societal Arrangement × 1–14 years with single mother interaction: t = 1.14, p = .253, Societal System × fifteen years with single mother interaction: t = 0.34, p = .731). This effect remained non-significant (F(two, 13687) = 0.834, p = .453) when the sample was restricted to individuals born between 1946 and 1974 who lived for their whole childhood until the age of fifteen in the Federal republic of germany or GDR, respectively.

Discussion

This is the first study to testify that growing upward with a single female parent is related to a stable although minor reduction in general life satisfaction across the adult life-span until old age when adjusting for poor childhood SES. Individuals who spent their entire first 15 years of life living with a single mother showed on boilerplate approximately twice the reduction in life satisfaction compared to individuals who spent only part of their first 15 years with a unmarried mother, which is consistent with a dose-response relationship. This suggests that growing upward with a single mother throughout all of babyhood and early on boyhood and the related lack of resources from the father more outweighs the well-described negative effects related to parental separation [5, 7–9].

The reduction in adulthood life satisfaction was partially mediated by the individuals' living conditions, including their lower socio-economic status and educational level, lower concrete health status, and poor social integration and romantic success in adulthood. This finding is consistent with studies on developed well-existence afterward parental divorce [five, 25]. The decrease in adulthood life satisfaction was non moderated past age, thus nosotros could not detect waning of the effect of unmarried parenthood with increasing altitude to childhood. This is in contrast to prove on negative life events during adulthood including divorce, bereavement, and unemployment for which the general principle of adaptation holds positing that the bear on of an negative event decreases with increasing time since the outcome has happened (e.g., [17, 26]). However, and in dissimilarity to studies on effects of negative life events during adulthood we here studied long-term furnishings of indelible childhood family settings which are possibly more than probable to lead to long-term changes to the gear up-signal of full general life-satisfaction during adulthood. Moreover, we could not find evidence supporting the widely held notion from popular scientific discipline that boys are more than affected than girls by the absence of their fathers. Yet, we did find that in females who experienced parental separation during babyhood, the upshot was more strongly mediated past poor physical health and a smaller number of friends than in their male counterparts.

Finally, we did not observe testify for differential associations between growing upwardly with a single mother in the western oriented FRG compared to the socialist GDR––this although ane might wait that the college divorce rate in the GDR could have reduced the stigma associated with unmarried parenthood in the GDR. Moreover, one might await that the higher rate of female participation in the work force as well as the higher number of children in 24-hour interval-care in the socialist GDR might have mitigated inequalities between children raised in single parent households compared to children from two-parent households in the GDR.

Nevertheless, our finding of a not-significant difference between the FRG and the Gdr is consequent with comparisons between children raised by single parents in states with well-established welfare systems such every bit Kingdom of norway every bit compared to children from single parents from states with less well-established welfare systems such as the U.s. who neither found any differences [27]. Ane explanation for the lack of differences in such comparisons can be summarized past a relative deprivation perspective which holds that existing small economic differences may still matter a lot in societies with a more even distribution of appurtenances and which is in contrast to an accented economical deprivation perspective [26]. A second caption for finding no differences between the FRG and the Gdr is that our respondents who grew up in the GDR responded to the study many years after the breakup of the socialist country of the GDR in 1990. The breakup of the socialist organisation has atomic number 82 to many changes and new economic hardships to a part of the population [28]. It remains possible that such economic hardships might have stroke adults who grew up with a unmarried mother more strongly than their counterparts who grew up in ii-parent families as they perchance also received less support from their male parent while they were already adults. A 3rd explanation for finding no differences betwixt the FRG and the GDR is that the socio-emotional resources provided by the begetter were too defective in unmarried-parent households in the German democratic republic. The deprivation from the male parent'south socio-emotional resources may have outbalanced the effects of some maybe more favorable societal circumstances for single-parents in the GDR.

As a limitation of the study, it remains impossible to derive causality as growing up in a unmarried-mother household and adulthood life satisfaction might both be influenced by a third variable such as genetic factors. In this respect, there is prove that the adventure of divorce is up to 30–40% hereditary which is mediated by personality traits such as negative affectivity [29]. In a similar vein, information technology is possible that the direction of the causal influence between the factors that we tested as mediators and life satisfaction are different than we have specified them. For instance it is possible that the relationship between physical health and life satisfaction is contrary involving an impact of life satisfaction on physical health.

A further limitation lies in the measurement of the babyhood family settings which were reported retrospectively during adulthood. While it may be assumed that adults are able to reliably written report whether they spent the entire babyhood vs. only a part of their childhood with a single mother, this variable may all the same exist subject to memory distortions. Furthermore, regarding the possible mediating factors of the issue of childhood family settings on adulthood life satisfaction, physical health could take been measured in a more sophisticated fashion. In the nowadays study information technology was assessed by the number of visits to the medico, while more objective measures of physical health such every bit a doctor's examinations or physical fitness tests might take revealed different findings.

In conclusion, the nowadays report shows that growing upwards with a single mother—in particular if the father is absent-minded for the entire childhood—predicts a pocket-size but stable decrease in life satisfaction across machismo that is partly explained by lower socio-economical status and educational achievement, inferior concrete health, poor social integration, and lower likelihood of romantic relationship success in adulthood. Contrary to expectations this event was not moderated past sex, age, or the societal arrangement in which the childhood was spent. Thus, the differences in life satisfaction were like for younger and older, male person and female, as well every bit participants who spent their childhood in the western oriented Federal republic of germany or in the socialistic GDR.

Future cantankerous-cultural enquiry comparing effects of family settings on adulthood life-outcomes in several studies from different cultures may identify macro-level protective factors that could be targeted to improve the prospects of single parents and their children.

Supporting information

S2 Table. Estimated marginal means of adulthood life circumstances by childhood family settings controlling participants' sex, age, and childhood SES (z-standardized on total sample; Chiliad, SE in brackets).

Values with unlike superscripts vary significantly (p < 0.05; Bonferroni-corrected).

https://doi.org/ten.1371/journal.pone.0179639.s002

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: SL DR.
  2. Data curation: DR.
  3. Formal analysis: DR.
  4. Methodology: SL DR.
  5. Validation: SL DR.
  6. Visualization: SL DR.
  7. Writing – original typhoon: SL DR.
  8. Writing – review & editing: SL DR.

References

  1. 1. U.South. Demography Bureau. Household relationship and living arrangements of children nether 18 years. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Function; 2014.
  2. 2. Diener E. New findings and time to come directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist. 2012;67(viii):590–seven. pmid:23163434
  3. three. Diener Eastward, Chan MY. Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied Psychology: Wellness and Well-Being. 2011;three(1):1–43.
  4. 4. Amato PR. The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family unit. 2000;62(4):1269–87.
  5. five. Amato PR. The touch on of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The Future of Children. 2005;15(2):75–96. pmid:16158731
  6. 6. Biblarz TJ, Stacey J. How does the gender of parents affair? Periodical of Marriage and Family unit. 2010;72(one):3–22.
  7. 7. Amato PR, Keith B. Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1991;110(ane):26–46. pmid:1832495
  8. 8. Bjarnason T, Andersson B, Choquet 1000, Elekes Z, Morgan Chiliad, Rapinett G. Alcohol civilization, family unit structure and adolescent alcohol use: Multilevel modeling of frequency of heavy drinking amongst 15–16 year old students in xi European countries. Journal of studies on alcohol. 2003;64(2):200–viii. pmid:12713193
  9. 9. Bjarnason T, Bendtsen P, Arnarsson AM, Borup I, Iannotti RJ, Löfstedt P, et al. Life satisfaction among children in different family structures: A comparative study of 36 western societies. Children & Guild. 2012;26(1):51–62.
  10. x. Amato PR, Keith B. Parental Divorce and Developed Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Union and Family unit. 1991;53(i):43–58.
  11. 11. Fomby P, Cherlin AJ. Family Instability and Child Well-Being. American Sociological Review. 2007;72(2):181–204. pmid:21918579
  12. 12. Waters E, Merrick S, Treboux D, Crowell J, Albersheim L. Zipper security in infancy and early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal written report. Child Evolution. 2000;71(iii):684–9. pmid:10953934
  13. 13. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ. The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children. 1997;seven:55–71. pmid:9299837
  14. fourteen. Pruett KD. Fatherneed: Why father care is every bit essential as female parent care for your child. New York: Costless Press; 2000.
  15. 15. Zimbardo PG, Coulombe ND. Man (dis)continued: How technology has sabotaged what it ways to be male person. London: Rider; 2015.
  16. xvi. Colina MA, O'Neill J. Underclass behaviors in the U.s.a.: Measurement and analysis of determinants. New York: Middle for the Study of Business and Government; 1993.
  17. 17. Luhmann M, Hofmann Westward, Eid K, Lucas RE. Subjective well-being and accommodation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012;102(3):592–615. pmid:22059843
  18. 18. Böttcher K. Scheidung in Ost- und Westdeutschland: Der Einfluss der Frauenerwerbstätigkeit auf die Ehestabilität. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 2006;58:592–616.
  19. nineteen. Avenarius H, Baethge M, Döbert H, Hetmeier H, Klieme E, Meister-Scheufelen Grand, et al. Bildung in Deutschland: Ein indikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zu Bildung und Migration Bielefeld: Konsortium Bildungsberichterstattung; 2006.
  20. 20. Wagner GG, Frick JR, Schupp J. The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)—Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch. 2007;127(1):161–91.
  21. 21. Sandvik E, Diener E, Seidlitz 50. Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and not-self-written report measures. Journal of Personality. 1993;61(3):317–42.
  22. 22. Ganzeboom HBG, Treiman DJ. Internationally comparable measures of occupational condition for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Enquiry. 1996;25:201–39.
  23. 23. OECD. Classifying educational programmes: manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: OECD; 1999.
  24. 24. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
  25. 25. Lacey RE, Bartley M, Pikhart H, Stafford Yard, Cablevision Northward. Parental separation and adult psychological distress: an investigation of material and relational mechanisms. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:272. pmid:24655926
  26. 26. Richter D, Lemola S. Institutional rearing is associated with lower general life satisfaction in adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality. 2014;48:93–97.
  27. 27. Breivik K, Olweus D. Children of divorce in a Scandinavian welfare country: Are they less afflicted than US children? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2006;47:61–74. pmid:16433663
  28. 28. Chevalier A, Marie O. Economic uncertainty, parental selection, and children'due south educational outcomes. Journal of Political Economy. in press.
  29. 29. Jocklin 5, McGue Thousand, Lykken DT. Personality and divorce: a genetic analysis. Periodical of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996; 71:288–299. pmid:8765483

lewisportle.blogspot.com

Source: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179639

0 Response to "Research Shows That Growing Up in a Single-parent Family"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel